SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 491

D. P. UNIYAL
Parmeshwar Sahai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Uniyal, J. - This reference has been made by the learned Civil and Sessions Judge, Saharanpur on the ground that the order passed by the Judicial Officer, Saharanpur on April 15, 1963 that a case under Section 193, I.P.C. be registered against Dr. Prameshwarl Sahai Mathur was illegal and liable to be quashed.

2. The facts leading to this reference are some what unusual and may be shortly stated. One Latif instituted a complaint against Dalel Singh and others under Sections 323 and 379 I.P.C. In support of his case Latif filed an injury report prepared by Dr. Parmeshwar Sahai Mathur which described a number of injuries found on the person of Latif. Dalel Singh accused pleaded that no such incident took place and that no injuries were received by Latif. In support of his contention he filed an injury report of one Jaipal Singh, a relation of his, prepared by Dr. Parmes war Sahai Mathur on March 16, 1963. The accused also filed another injury report of the same man of the same date prepared by Dr. S.S. Misra, Civil Surgeon, Saharanpur and countersigned by Dr. B.R. Sabbarwal, Medical Officer Incharge District Hospital, Saharanpur. The Magistrate discharged Dalel Singh and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top