SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 376

H. C. P. TRIPATHI, T. RAMABHADRAN
Sheo Pujan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.C.P. Tripathi, J. - These appeals arise out of a common judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Basti and are being disposed of together. Appellant Sheo Pujan has been convicted of an offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to death. Appellants Sheo Murat and Jeet Bahadur have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and each of them has been sentenced to imprisonment for life. The learned Sessions Judge has made a reference for the confirmation of the sentence of death imposed on Sheo Pujan.

2. Appellants Sheo Pujan and Sheo Murat are real brothers and appellant Jeet Bahadur is their collateral. These appellants and the deceased Indrajeet who happened to be their distant collateral resided in contiguous houses in village Dhaurahara within the jurisdiction of police station Dhanghata in the district of Basti.

3. The prosecution case in short is as follows :-

Indrajeet (deceased) was a well to do cultivator who used to lend grain on interest. The three appellants had taken grain from him on loan and had failed to refund the same. The persistent demands made by the deceased for the return of the grain had embittered the appellants aga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top