SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 531

HARI SWARUP
L. H. Sugar Factory Mazdoor Pilibhit – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Pilibhit – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.C. Agarwal, Advocate, For the Appellant / Standing Counsel, for the Opposite Parties

ORDER

Hari Swarup, J. - The L. H. Sugar Factory Mazdoor Union has filed this petition challenging an agreement entered into between M/s. L. H. Sugar Factory and the Krantikari Mazdoor Union for reference of the matter in dispute to arbitration and for prohibiting the Regional Conciliation Officer, Bareilly to proceed with the arbitration. The petitioner has also asked for a writ to quash the order of the District Magistrate by which the Regional Conciliation Officer was nominated to arbitrate.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the Krantikari Mazdoor Union was not a representative body and should not therefore enter into an agreement with the management so as to bind all the workmen. It is however, not necessary to decide this point at this stage as the necessary conditions for continuance of the arbitration have not yet 'come into existence.

3. Section 5-B of the U. P. Indus trial Disputes Act provides for voluntary reference of disputes to arbitration. Under clause (i) where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended and employer and the workmen agree, the dispute can be referred to an arbitrator specified in the agreement. Clause (iii) provides for a copy of the arb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top