SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 451

B. D. GUPTA, S. N. KATJU.
Ram Chandra Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Mahadeoji Mahabirji – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.P. Misra, Advocate, For the Appellant / K.L. Grover, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

B.D. Gupta, J. - This is an appeal from an order of the learned 1st Additional Civil Judge of Kanpur rejecting a preliminary objection raised on behalf of the judgment debtor in connection with proceedings for execution of a decree for, among other things, pendente lite and future mesne profits. There is no controversy that the plaintiff-decree-holder, who is a deity, had been allowed to sue as a pauper. When the decree-holder applied for execution of the decree for mesne profits the objection, among others, raised on behalf of the judgment-debtor was that execution could not proceed in respect of mesne profits, regarding which the decree-holder had not yet paid any court-fee, until court-fee was paid by the decree-holder. The learned Additional Civil Judge took the view that the amount of court-fee payable on mesne profits would be a lien on the money that may be realised by execution and the decree-holder will not be allowed to receive any amount so realised until court-fee was paid, but that court-fee was not a condition precedent before execution could be proceeded with. Having beard learned counsel for the judgment-debtor-appellant we are of the opinion that the view t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top