SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 320

SATISH CHANDRA
Darshan – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue, U. P. , Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bir Pratap Singh and N.C. Pandey, Advocates, for the Petitioner; Ram Surat Singh, Advocate, for the Opposite Parties

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra, J. - The petitioner filed a suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act for a declaration that he was the sirdar of an area 3.29 acres of plot No. 497. He alleged that the entire plot 497 having an area 5.29 acres, was demised to the petitioner on lease by the then zamindar, on 20th July, 1935. The petitioner had been in possession over the entire area of this plot and had been paying rent for it. But in the revenue records his name was entered only over an area of 2 acres. The rest of the area was entered as banjar. The suit was contested by the Gaon Samaj as well as the State Government. The trial court decreed the suit. It found that the petitioner was the tenant of the entire plot and hence its sirdar. The Gaon Samaj went up in appeal and succeeded. The Additional Commissioner, Jhansi Division, held that the whole plot was undoubtedly leased out to the plaintiff, and that he was paying rent for it; but the plaintiff was in cultivatory possession over an area 2 acres only and not over the rest of the area of 3.29 acres. Since he did not actually enter into possession over this area which was lying banjar, it vested it-4 t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top