SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 519

R. CHANDRA
Bhika Mal Mussaddi Lal – Appellant
Versus
Chunni Lal Parsotam Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.L. Tiwari, M.M. Gaur and Murari Lal Srivastava, Advocates, For the Appellant / M.M. Lal, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

R. Chandra, J. - This is a plaintiff's appeal and arises out of a suit for money.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit for the recovery of Rs. 1213121/-. It was alleged that on 13th August, 1953 an order was placed with the defendant for the supply of 150 bags (weighing 2 mds. and 30 seers each) , of D-27 sugar of Kath Kuiyan Sugar Mills Ltd., District Deoria, at the rate of Rs. 281-per mound. Under that transaction, the plaintiff paid Rs. 4501- as advance for the supply of the goods. On 9th June, 1954, the plaintiff again placed another order for the supply of 220 bags (weighing 2 mds. and 30 seers each) , of sugar of F-28 quality of Saraiyan Sugar Mills, Sardarnagar, at the rate o# Rs. 32121- per maund. Under that transaction also, Rs. 6601/- were paid as advance for the supply of the goods. The defendant failed to supply the sugar within a reasonable time. So, under the telegram dated 11th June, 1954, the plaintiff was compelled to cancel both the orders. On these grounds a decree was claimed for refund of the advance money, and damages suffered due to the defendant's conduct.

3. The defendant contested the suit on a variety of grounds. On the pleadings of the parties, the le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top