SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 214

U. S. SRIVASTAVA, V. G. OAK
Ram Behari Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Munna Lal Shukla – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.L. Trivedi, Advocate, For the Respondents No. 1

JUDGMENT

V.G. Oak, C.J. - This special appeal arises out of consolidation proceedings. During consolidation operations chak No. 26 was allotted to Jagat Narain Singh. On 25-5-1964 Jagat Narain Singh executed a sale deed in favour of Munna Lal Shukla with respect to the entire holding comprised under chak No. 26. Later Jagat Narain Singh executed' another sale deed for the same property in favour of Ram Behari Shukla. Relying on the sale deed dated 25-5-1964 in his favour, Munna Lal Shukla applied for mutation. The application for mutation was dismissed by the Assistant Consolidation Officer. That decision was upheld in appeal and in revision by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) and the Deputy Director of Consolidation respectively. Against these decisions of the consolidation authorities, a writ petition was filed in this Court by Munna Lal Shukla. The writ petition has been allowed by a learned single Judge of this Court. He quashed the orders of the three consolidation authorities, and directed that the application by Munna Lal Shukla for mutation should be disposed of in accordance with law. Against that order of the learned single Judge, the present special appeal has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top