SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 417

S. S. DHAVAN
Amjad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Satyendra Nath Verma, Advocate, For the Appellant / N.D. Pant, Advocate, For the Respondents

JUDGMENT

S.S. Dhavan, J. - This is a plaintiff's second appeal from the decree of the Third Additional Civil Judge, Kanpur reversing that of the First Additional Munsif, Kanpur, and dismissing his suit for the recovery of Rs. 1941/13/- from a person who had been declared an evacuee under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act. The facts are these. The plaintiff appellant Amjad Ali and the first defendant respondent Ali Hasan are brothers. They owed two debts to two different persons (creditors' names are immaterial) . Both these creditors obtained decrees against Amjad Ali and Ali Hasan for Rs. 1850/- and Rs. 2033/- respectively. The plaintiff appellant paid oil the decretal amounts to both decree holders. He then filed a suit against his brother and co-debtor Ali Hasan under Section 43 of the Contract Act for recovery of Rs. 1941/13/- as the latter's share of the debt and impleaded the Union of India as a co-defendant because Ali Hasan had been declared evacuee. The appellant paid off the decrees in 1952. But Ali Hasan had already been declared an evacuee and his property evacuee property in 1951. The decree holders who had filed suits against the appellant and his brother and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top