SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 323

RAJESHWARI PRASAD
Jagdish Chand – Appellant
Versus
Narain Sahu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Yashodanandan, Advocate, For the Appellant / Swami Dayal, Advocate, for the Opposite Parties

JUDGMENT

Rajeshwari Prasad, J. - This is a defendant's appeal. Plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants seeking their eviction from the premises in suit and also seeking a decree for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits. A claim for money on account of damage alleged to have been done by the defendants to the premises, was also put forward by the plaintiff. The basis on which principally speaking the suit for ejectment was filed was that the defendants were defaulters and had not paid the arrears of rent within a month in spite of service of notice of demand on them.

2. The suit was contested by the defendants mainly on the ground that the monthly rent of the house in suit was only Rs. 6/- and not Rs. 9/- as demanded by the plaintiff through the notice relied upon by the plaintiff. On receipt of notice within time allowed by statute, the defendants remitted the arrears calculated at the rate of Rs. 6/- per month, consequently, the defendants could not be deemed to be defaulters within the meaning of Sec. 3 of the Control of Rent and Eviction Act.

3. It appears that the agreed rate of rent in this case used to be Rs. 6/-per month. It is also not disputed that the defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top