SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 351

G. C. MATHUR
Mujeebul Hasan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Rohikhand Division – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.C. Khare, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

G. C. Mathur, J. - The petitioner was elected a member of the Municipal Board, Bisalpur, district Pilibhit, in November, 1964. On February 11, 1966, the District Magistrate, Pilibhit sent a letter to the petitioner, stating that the Chairman, Municipal Board, Bisalpur, had reported that action for removal of the petitioner under Sec. 40 of the U.P. Municipalities Act be taken as he had not attended the meetings of the Board held from August 28, 1965 to January 15, 1966, for a period of over three months and asking the petitioner to report as to why the Commissioner should not be moved to take action against him. The petitioner submitted a reply to this letter, explaining that he had fallen seriously ill in August, 1965, on account of some heart ailment and had been advised to take complete rest for at least six months. He appended a medical certificate to his reply. He further explained that he had sent a note to the President of the Municipal Board through Shri Tufail Ahmad, informing him that he was ill. On April 23, 1966, the petitioner received a notice from the Commissioner, Rohilkhand Division, Bareilly, stating that it had been reported to him that the petitioner had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top