SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 337

S. N. SINGH
Permanand – Appellant
Versus
L. Murari Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D. N. Wali, Advocate, For the Appellant / J.N. Misra, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

S.N. Singh, J. - This is a defendant's appeal in a suit for ejectment and arrears.

2. It appears that after the termination of tenancy by notice dated 1-9-57 the plaintiff instituted the suit on 20-2-1958 and after the institution of the suit the defendant remitted certain amount which was due to the plaintiff-respondent from defendant for a period prior to the termination of the tenancy as well as for a period subsequent to the termination of the tenancy. This money order had been received after the institution of the suit. The plaintiff accepted the money order with a note that this acceptance was without prejudice to the suit already filed.

3. Both the courts below have decreed the suit for ejectment as well as arrears of rent.

4. The defendant has now come up to this Court in appeal and the only point raised in this appeal is that the acceptance of rent by the plaintiff after the institution of the suit for the period subsequent to the termination of the tenancy would amount to waiver or creation of a fresh tenancy by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant. The learned counsel for the appellant has in support of his submission cited a decision of this Court reported i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top