SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 461

D. P. UNIYAL
Sobha Ram – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Board – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Swami Dayal, Advocate, For the Appellant / Ambika Prasad, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

D.P. Uniyal, J. - The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was for injunction restraining the defendant Municipal Board, Firozabad from dispossessing the plaintiff after removal of the stall erected by him. It was alleged by the plaintiff that he was a monthly tenant at Rs. 11 /- p.m. of a plot of land near the bus station. It was asserted that the plaintiff had 1t been regularly paying the rent to the defendant and had raised the stall at considerable expenses. The Board by a resolution dated 22-4-1957 directed the removal of the said stall, hence the suit.

2. The defence of the Municipal Board was that the plaintiff was not a lessee of the land but was merely a lessee. It was said that the plaintiff had been permitted to put up a stall on payment of fee in the nature of tahbazari at the rate of Rs. 11 p.m. It was said that the land on which the stall stood vested in the Board and the plaintiff had no right to continue in possession of the structure. It was pleaded that the stall was obstructing the public street and the defendant was justified in asking for its removal.

3. The Munsif decreed the suit on the finding that in view of Sec, 265 (4) of the Municipalities Ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top