SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 537

D. S. MATHUR
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Janki Widow – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.N. Kakkar, S.S. Bhatnagar, Advocates, for the Applicant; R.R. Agarwal, Advocate, For the Respondents

JUDGMENT

D.S. Mathur, J. - This is a revision under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code by Oin Prakash against the order elated 8-1-1964,of the Ist Munsif of Bulandshahr - deciding issue No. 2 against him and at the same time directing him to :amend the plaint by having unnecessary pleas and reliefs deleted therefrom.

2. Om Prakash claims to be the adopted son of Smt. Janki, opposite party No. 1 widow of Lachhman Prasad, though she is not admitting this fact. However, there was litigation between them and by virtue of the compromise decree passed in that suit Om Prakash can claim to be the adopted son of Smt. Janki. Smt. Janki had inherited from her husband properties including agricultural land. Consolidation operations started in the village after the passing of the above compromise decree, but Om Prakash slid not make an objection under Sec, 9 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act to be referred hereinafter as the Act), as amended in 1958, within the period prescribed. He tiled an objection after the expiry of the period, but the consolidation authorities did not condone the delay with the result that the objection was rejected on the ground of limitation. The consolidation au

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top