SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 353

B. N. LOKUR
Anant Ram and Co. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.M. Dayal, Advocate, for the Petitioner; S.C, for the Opposite Parties

JUDGMENT

B.N. Lokur, J. - The petitioner firm which is a wholesale dealer in poppy heads imported in Uttar Pradesh from Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan was served with notices to pay duty on poppy heads sold during the months of July and August 1969. This writ petition seeks to quash the notices on the ground that the poppy heads concerned are not leviable to duty.

2. The duty, it is common ground, is sought to be levied as a countervailing duty under rule 42 (ii) of U.P. Poppy Head Rules, 1961, framed under the Opium Act, 1878. Rule 42-A which was added on the 1st July 1969, reads as follows :-

"42-A (i) Excise Duty shall be payable on poppy heads produced in Uttar Pradesh at the following rates :-

(a)

On poppy heads exported outside Uttar Pradesh.

25 Paise per kilogram.

(b)

On poppy leads other than mentioned at (a)

50 Paise per kilogram.

(ii) A counter-wailing duty at the rate of 50 Paise per kilogram shall be payable on poppy heads produced outside Uttar Pradesh and imported into Uttar Pradesh."

It is averred by the petitioner firm and not dispute by the State and the excise authorities that the entire quantity of poppy heads in respect of which the duty has been demanded was importe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top