SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(All) 228

G. C. MATHUR, W. BROOME
Prabhu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Radha Krishna, Advocate, for the Applicant; Gur Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the Opposite Party

JUDGMENT

G. C. Mathur, J. - A common question of law relating to the liability of the railway administration for damages in respect of short delivery of goods booked at railway risk but under defective packing arises in these two revisions and, therefore, they are being disposed of by one common judgment.

2. Civil Revision No. 1125 of 1965 arises out of Suit No. 26 of 1962 filed by the applicant for recovery of a sum of Rs. 465/- with interest for short delivery of several consignments of copper scrap. The forwarding notes in respect of these consignments showed that the packing was defective and was not in the manner prescribed in the Goods Tariff, Part I, which required articles like copper scrap to be packed as follows :

"Must be securely packed in strong double gunny, not patched or otherwise repaired, and securely stitched."

The forwarding notes showed that some of the bags used in the consignment, were old, used, weak and resewn. The consignments were booked and delivered some time in the year 1961 and the case is, therefore, governed by the Indian Railways Act, as it stood prior to the amendment which came into force from January 1, 1962, which will hereinafter be referred to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top