SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(All) 251

JAGDISH SAHAI, M. H. BEG
Commissioner of S. T. , U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Sen Shyam Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. N. Singh, S. C, for the Applicant; K. C. Agarwal, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Jagdish Sahai, J. - The question referred by the judge (Revisions) Sales Tax to this Court for its opinion is :

Whether in the circumstances and on facts of the case the application in revision filed by the Commissioner, Sales Tax, U. P. against assessment order eras barred by time ?

We differed in respect of the answer to this question. One of us (Jagdish Sakai, J.) answered the question in the affirmative against the department and in favour of the assessee. The other learned judge (Beg, J.) constituting the Bench, answered the first part of the question in the negative and opined that the period of limitation for the Commissioner to prefer a revision application under Section 10 (3) (i) of the Act will not start from the date of the assessment order. He answered the second part of the question also in the negative by saying that the period of limitation would not commence to run from any date lying within the discretion of or depending upon the wishes of the assessing officer, but would commence in accordance with Section 10 (3-B) , from the actual date on which the Commissioner has been duly apprised of the contents of the assessment order in a mode which may be deemed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top