SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 378

O. P. TRIVEDI
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ch. Ram Saran Vakil – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
H.N. Trithari, Advocate, for the Applicant; K.N. Misra, Advocate, for the Opposite-parties

JUDGMENT

O.P. Trivedi, J. - This petition in revision has been filed by the plaintiff Dilip Kumar who had filed a suit for injunction against the opposite party stating that the opposite party was interfering with his construction of a certain structure. During pendency of the suit the plaintiff-petitioner prayed for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with making the construction. The opposite party's defence was that the land on which the disputed construction was put up was in his possession; that he possessed right of way on the land. The defendant also moved an application for temporary injunction against the plaintiff petitioner before the Munsif stating that the construction in dispute had been put up but the plaintiff threatened to use the same as a latrine. The trial Court grant a temporary injunction against the plaintiff also on the report of the commissioner that the disputed construction opened on the door of the defendant-opposite party. The plaintiff was restrained from making use of the construction as a latrine during pendency of the suit. Against the temporary injunction granted in favour of the defendant the petitioner appealed which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top