SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 356

A. P. SRIVASTAVA, B. DAYAL
Gulsher Khan Supardar – Appellant
Versus
Bedi Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.B. Garg and Ambika Prasad, Advocates, For the Appellant / A.P. Gupta, Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

A. P. Srivastava, J. - These are two connected execution first appeals and may be conveniently disposed of by the same judgment.

2. One Bidhi Chand filed a suit for recovery of money against Bedi Lal and others. After filing the suit he applied for the attachment before judgment of certain properties belonging to Bedi Lal defendant. The properties included a share in a grove and certain machinery installed in that grove. Attachment before judgment was ordered, and a Vakil Commissioner was appointed to make the attachment. He went to the spot, attached the properties, and put them in the supurdigi of one Mohammad Gulsher Khan. The latter executed a supurdnama in respect of the property. The suit was ultimately decreed, and an execution application. bearing execution case no. 39 of 1955 was filed to execute the decree. The decree was satisfied in part and by an order dated the 9th of October 1953 the execution application was struck off in part satisfaction. In course of the execution case it was alleged by the judgment-debtor Bedi Lal that some parts of the attached machinery which had been put in the custody of Mohammad Gulsher Khan had been removed and misappropriated by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top