SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 255

O. H. MOOTHAM, R. DAYAL
Amar Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Officer, Gyanpur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.K.S. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

O.H. Mootham, C.J. - This is an appeal. against the order of Mr. Justice Tandon dated the 19th March, 1958.

2. The appellant and the second respondent were candidates for election to the office of Pradhan of a Gaon Sabha. The nomination paper of the second respondent was rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that the taxes due by him to the Gaon Sabha were in arrears and he was therefore disqualified under Cl. (e) of Sec. 5A of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. The appellant was accordingly declared to be duly elected. The second respondent then filed a petition under Sec. 12C of the Act in which he called in question the election of the appellant on the ground that his, that is the second respondent's nomination paper had been improperly rejected and that the result of the election had been materially affected thereby. The election petition was allowed, and by an order dated the 13th June, 1956, the Sub-Divisional Officer set aside the election of the appellant and declared a casual vacancy. The appellant then filed a petition in this court under Article 226 of the Constitution in which he challenged the validity of that order on the ground, inter alia, that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top