Back
JAGMOHAN LAL
Jagdish Sahai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER
Jagmohan Lal, J. - The petitioner Jagdish Sahai Agnihotri was in the employ of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh as an Excise Inspector. He was compulsorily retired under Rule 465-A of Civil Service Regulations by the State Government under an order dated 17-4-1969 (Annexure 10 to the writ petition). He made a representation against that order which was also dismissed by the State Government on 26-8-1969, vide Annexure 12. Being dissatisfied with these orders he filed this writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh, Sri R.P. Khosla, the then Secretary to Government, Uttar Pradesh, Excise Department, Smt. Lata Singh, Deputy Secretary to Government in the said department, the Excise Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh and the Assistant Excise Commissioner, Kanpur Circle, Kanpur. He challenged these orders on various grounds mentioned in the petition, the main ground being that the orders were mala fide and they had been passed at the instance of Sri R.P. Khosla and Smt. Lata Singh. He prayed for a writ of certiorari to quash these orders and the issue of a direction or order commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to continue in service from the date he handed
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
