Anil Kumar, J.

Heard Ms. Manju Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Roohi Siddiqui, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State on the second bail application moved on behalf of the appellant.

2. Ms. Manju Gupta, learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that in the present case an F.I.R. dated 2.9.2008 was lodged against Sohan Lal, Kallu, Bholu and two unknown persons. During investigation, police had submitted charge-sheet against Vijay Kumar Gupta and Mohit Mishra however has not submitted charge-sheet against Sohan Lal and Kallu. She also submits that during trial Mohit Misra alias Golu was declared juvenile and on the same set of evidence, appellant has been convicted whereas co-accused/Vishal Gupta alias Chhotey has been acquitted

3. Learned counsel for the appellant while pressing the second bail application of the appellant/Bholu submits that the accused appellant is in jail for last about nine years, so taking into consideration the said facts as well as the law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the cases of Kaushal Singh Vs. State of U.P. passed in S.LP. [Crl.] No. 2356 of 2010, Pujari Yadav and others Vs. State of U.P. pas