P.K.S.BAGHEL
Abu Nasar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH BAGHEL, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the following reliefs:
(i) issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the Respondent no. 2 not to disposes the petitioner from gata no.444 area 500 kari, situated in village Koilari Bujurg Tehsil Mehnagar District Azamgarh in the interest of justice;
(ii) issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the respondent No. 3 to decide the application of the petitioner filed under rule 109 of the C.H. Act during pendency of the present writ petition, in the interest of justice."
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Consolidation Officer vide order dated 22.8.2017 has decided his objections under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 but the said order has not been carried out in the revenue records. The petitioner has moved an application under Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954. When no action was taken he has also approached the Deputy Director, Consolidation on 15.2.2018. A copy of the application, which bears the order passed by the D.D.C. dated 16.2.2018 directing the Consolidation O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.