SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 383

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Om Prakash, N.D. Ojha, JJ.
Satna Cement Works – Appellant
Versus
The Nagar Mahapalika and Another - Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 560 of 1984
Decided On : 07-01-1985

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Kumar Agarwal

Octroi can only be levied on goods that are 'brought within' the limits of a Nagar Mahapalika and are brought for consumption, use, or sale therein. The mere fact that goods pass through the limits of a Nagar Mahapalika in transit is not sufficient to attract octroi.

Headnote:

OCTROI - LEVY - GOODS BROUGHT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF NAGAR MAHAPALIKA - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 172(2)(B) OF THE U.P. NAGAR MAHAPALIKA ADHINIYAM, 1959 - GOODS MERELY PASSING THROUGH THE LIMITS OF NAGAR MAHAPALIKA IN TRANSIT - NO OCTROI LEVIABLE.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling cement, challenged the levy of octroi by the Nagar Mahapalika on cement stored at its Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur, which was brought within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika but was not unloaded or reloaded and was taken out through another octroi barrier for its destination beyond the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the mere fact that the cement entered the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika and was sold from the Petitioner's sale office within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika was not sufficient to levy octroi, as the cement did not come to a repose within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika.

Issues: Whether octroi could be levied on goods merely passing through the limits of a Nagar Mahapalika in transit.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Section 172(2)(b) of the U.P. Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959, and held that for octroi to be levied, the goods should be 'brought within' the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika and should be brought for consumption, use, or sale therein. The Court held that the journey of the goods should break within the said limits and the goods should lie there in a state of rest, quiet, or stillness for 'consumption, use, or sale therein.'

Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petition and directed the Nagar Mahapalika to issue transit passes to the Petitioner for the cement taken to its Factory Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur and not to realize octroi in regard to the said cement. The Court also directed the Nagar Mahapalika to refund the amount of octroi realized from the Petitioner in respect of the cement referred to above on and after 1st February, 1984.

JUDGMENT :

N.D. Ojha, J.

The Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of cement and has its factory at Satna in the State of Madhya Pradesh. It has its office at 230, Bansidhar Market, Uncha Mandi, Allahabad, Which falls within the limits of Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad. At this office the Petitioner enters into contract of sale of cement with customers both within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika as well as beyond it. It maintains two godowns: one in mohalla Himmatganj within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad, and the other in village Dabrajpur at C.O.D. Road out side the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika, which the Petitioner has termed as Factory Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur. For bringing cement by road from the Petitioner's factory at Satna to its godown in Mohalla Himmatganj as well as to its Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur the trucks have to enter the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika through an octroi barrier. The cement which is stocked in the godown in mohalla Himmatganj after being brought within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika through the aforesaid octroi barrier remains within the said limits and is according to the Petitioners sold to the customers within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika from its sale office at Bansldhar market. The Petitioner admits its liability to pay octroi in regard to such cement. As regards as the cement which is stocked at the Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur, the case of the Petitioner is that after entering the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad through the aforesaid octroi barrier the cement is soon thereafter taken out of the said limits to reach its destination in village Dubrajpur out side the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika. This cement also while it remains lying in the said village is sold by the Petitioner from its sale office at Bansidhar market. According to the Petitioner the cement which is clocked in village Dubrajpur passes through the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika only in transit In connection with its onward journey to village Dubrajpur and the Nagar Mahapalika for the last about 12 years, since when the Factory Cement Dump at Dubrajpur has been in existence, had been issuing transit passes at the time of the entry 01 trucks within its limits at the aforesaid cctroi barrier which used to be surrounded at the octroi barrier at the other end while going ou of the said limits in connection with the onward journey to village Dubrajpur.

2. The Petitioner's grievance in the present writ petition is that from 1st February, 1984 the Nagar Mahapalika has stopped issuing passes as, aforesaid and has started realising octroi from it in regard to such cement also which only passes through its limits for being stocked in village Dubrajpur. The reliefs prayed for in this writ petition are that a direction may be given to the Respondents, namely, the Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad and its octroi superintendent to issue transit passes as they used to do earlier in regard to the cement taken by the Petitioner to its Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur and not to realise octroi in regard to the said cement as also to refund the amount of octroi realised in respect thereof on and after 1st February, 1984.

3. The only point which has been urged by counsel for the Petitioner in support of the aforesaid reliefs is that even though the Petitioner's cement stored at its Cement Dump in village Dubrajpur passes through the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad for being stored at the said Cement Dump and was sold from its sale office at Bansiohar market it could not be held to have been 'brought within' the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika within the meaning of Section 172(2)(b) of the U.P. Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It was urged that no octroi was payable in respect of the said stock inasmuch as it was not stored and was not in existence at any place within the limits of the Nagar Mahapalika at the time of its sale.
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top