S. K. SEN, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Sarva Krishna Ajay Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard Sri Arun Tandon counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh learned standing counsel appearing for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner praying for quashing of the order dated 27th May, 2002 passed by the Controller of Molasses/Excise Commissioner, U.P., Allahabad. A further prayer has been made commanding the Respondents to reconsider the application of the Petitioner afresh for grant of permission u/s 7A of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964.
3. Brief facts giving rise to this writ petition are as follows:
Petitioner is a firm registered under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. Petitioner claimed to be dealer/ handling agent of molasses. Petitioner claims that earlier by the order of Controller molasses, he was allotted different quantity of molasses. Petitioner further claims that he has also been granted. "No objection" certificate for export of molasses out of the State. Petitioner filed an application u/s 7A of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, praying that he be granted permission for 1,00,000 quintals of molasses. He has stated in his application that the said molasses will be
Chandigarh Administration and another Vs. Jagjit Singh and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.