SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 753

SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAJEEV MISRA
Ram Kumar Misra – Appellant
Versus
Competent Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Chandan Sharma, Adv., P.H. Vashishtha, Adv., S. Narain, Adv., Vijay Bahadur Singh, Adv., Vinod Shankar Tripathi, Adv., Subhash Rathi, Adv., Vineet Pandey, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RAJEEV MISRA, J.

1. Ram Kumar Misra, the writ petitioner has filed present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging order dated 30.12.1981 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition), passed by respondent No.1 Competent Authority (Urban Land Ceiling ), Bareilly, whereby an area of 8258.21 Sq-meters of land of petitioner has been declared as excess-vacant land and notice dated 24/25.1.2000 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) also issued by respondent No.1 purported to be under Section 11 (8) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1976') asking the petitioner to file his objections, if any, alongwith evidence before respondent-1 on or before 3.2.2000 to the proposed compensation in lieu of land belonging to petitioner being declared as excess-vacant land. Apart from aforesaid reliefs, petitioner has also prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents not to dispossess petitioner from land in dispute.

2. We have heard Sri Vijay Bahadur Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri P.H. Vashishtha, lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top