SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 773

MOHD FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Purshottam Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Vinay Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Sarjoo Ram, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

MOHD. FAIZ ALAM KHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 as well as learned AGA appearing for the State.

2. This appeal has been preferred by appellants to set-aside the judgment and order dated 28/29.04.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.2, Pratapgarh passed in Session Trial No. 442 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No. 25 of 2018, under Sections 354-A, 504, 506, 352 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (10) & 3 (2)(5A) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Baghrai, District Pratapgarh and also to set-aside the summoning order dated 22.11.2018 passed by the learned trial court.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the court below has materially erred in summoning the appellants to face trial as well as in rejecting the application of the appellants moved before the court below under Section 227 Cr.P.C. to discharge them in pursuance of the order dated 24.01.2019 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 585 of 2019. It is further submitted that an F.I.R. was lodged by the opposite party No.2 against the appellants alleging that on 14.02.2018 at 4.30 P.M., when the victim was returning back from her college, the accused p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top