SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 943

MOHD FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Hemant Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Meera Tripathi, Adv., Manish Vaish, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as Sri S.N. Tilhari, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

2. This criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellants to set aside the order dated 16.11.2018 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Balrampur in Complaint Case No. 56/2018 (Banshi Lal Vs. Hemant Kumar Mishra and others) under Section 323/ 504/ 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Utraula, District Balrampur and allow the present criminal appeal and discharge the appellants from all offences.

3. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are that an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was moved by respondent No.2 namely Banshilal against appellants before C.J.M., Balrampur alleging therein that on 27.05.2014 at about 8:00 P.M., appellants (accused persons) started abusing him in front of his house. Earlier also appellants had assaulted him and a criminal case pertaining to that incident was pending in the Court. The appellants were pressurizing the complainant to compromise in the above mentioned case. On the aforesaid day and time the appellants after entering his house st

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top