SUDHIR AGARWAL, OM PRAKASH VII
Raj Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Om Prakash-VII, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred by accused appellants against judgment and order dated 20/21.12.1983 passed by District & Sessions Judge, Ballia in Session Trial No. 196 of 1982 (State vs. Raj Nath and others) convicting and sentencing appellant Raj Nath for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC (simpliciter) to undergo imprisonment for life and accused appellants Basgit and Buddhan for the offence under Sections 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC to undergo imprisonment for life.
2. Facts of case, in nutshell, as unfolded by informant Smt. Rama Devi wife of Shyam Lal in the First Information Report (in short 'F.I.R.'), are that informant's husband were seven brothers. Younger brother Mahngu had a business of milk in Asam and another brother was having hotel business. Four years ago Raj Nath had taken Rs. 3600/-from informant's husband to purchase agricultural land but Raj Nath purchased agricultural land in the name of his son only. When this fact came into knowledge to deceased, an altercation took place between deceased and accused Raj Nath. Panchayat was convened and it was decided that out of Rs. 3600/-, Rs. 1700/- will be returned by
Bhagaloo Lodh Vs. State of U. P.
Brahm Swaroop and another Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dalip Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Ganga Bhawani Vs. Raya Pati Venkat Reddy
Rizan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Sachchey Lal Tiwari Vs. State of U. P.
State of Rajasthan V. Om Prakash
State of Rajasthan Vs. Smt. Kalki and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.