PANKAJ MITHAL, SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Ram Nivas – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the validity of the declaration dated 11.5.2012 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in respect of the land of various villages in district Agra notified for acquisition under Section 4 of the Act on 3.10.2005 lastly published on 28.11.2005 for the benefit of the Agra Development Authority.
2. The petitioner apart from seeking quashing of the aforesaid declaration has also made a prayer for the quashing of the entire acquisition proceedings pursuant to the notifications dated 3.10.2005 and 11.05.2012 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act respectively.
3. The primary ground for attacking the declaration made under Section 6 of the Act is that it is beyond time of one year from the date of publication of the notification under Section 4 of the Act as provided under proviso (ii) to Section 6(1) of the Act; and that the objections filed by the petitioner under Section 5-A of the Act were not
Ashok Kumar & others Vs. State of Haryana and another
Deep Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Income Tax (Investigation) New Delhi and another Vs. Pooran Mal and sons
Mishra Sugandhi Karyalaya Vs. State of U.P. and others
Oxford English School Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu & others
Padmasundara Rao (Dead) Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & others
R. Indira Saratchandra Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
State of Punjab and another Vs. Rajesh Syal
Vijay Narayan Thatte & others Vs. State of Maharastra & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.