PRITINKER DIWAKER, RAJ BEER SINGH
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
Pritinker Diwaker, J.
This appeal arises out of the impugned judgement and order dated 03.05.1988 passed by II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat in Sessions Trial Nos. 50 of 1985 (State Vs. Dinesh) and 104A of 1985 (State Vs. Surendra Singh), convicting the accused-appellants under Section 302/34 of IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life.
2. In the present case, name of the deceased is Ram Swaroop Tiwari. Deceased stood as a surety for appellant Dinesh but as Dinesh continued to commit crimes, deceased informed him that if he will not make himself correct, in such a condition, deceased would be compelled to get his bail cancelled. Looking to this attitude of the deceased, accused Dinesh got annoyed with him and with the help of co-accused Surendra Singh, Umesh (died during investigation) and Ramesh (absconded during trial), on 03.08.1984 committed the murder of the deceased by causing gun shot and axe injury to him. Incident has been witnesses by Shiv Kant Tiwari (PW-2), a child witness aged eight years (son of deceased), who at the time of commission of offence was with the deceased. Hearing the cries of the deceased, his another son Kamal
Anil Phukan Vs. State of Assam
Chittar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare Vs. State of Maharashtra
Golla Yelugu Govindu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Kartik Malhar Vs. State of Bihar
Namdeo vs State Of Maharashtra
Nivrutti Pandurang Kokate and others V. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Karnataka Vs. Shantappa Madivalappa Galapuji & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.