Guddu Pandey vs State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 1806

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(All) 1806

B.AMIT STHALEKAR, ALI ZAMIN
Guddu Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jagdish Singh Sengar, A.K. Rai, D.K. Singh, I.K.Chaturvedi, I.M. Khan, Jai Singh, K.K.Singh, Lav Srivastava, Pradeep Chauhan, R.C. Gupta, R.P. Singh, Rajesh Kumar Dubey, Rakesh Kumar Pandey, S.K. Pal, Samit Gopal
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Samit Gopal

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentencing details of appellants. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. summary of incident leading to appeals. (Para 10 , 11)
3. details of deceased and injured individuals. (Para 12 , 13)
4. details of medical examinations and injuries sustained. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. dying declarations of injured witnesses. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. arguments centered on motives and witness credibility. (Para 30 , 31 , 72 , 96)
7. historical enmity as potential motive for violence. (Para 89 , 90 , 91 , 92)
8. court evaluation of evidence impact on convictions. (Para 106 , 107 , 109 , 113)
9. enhancement of sentences discussed. (Para 117 , 118)

JUDGMENT :

B. AMIT STHALEKAR, J.

1. Criminal Appeal No. 5100 of 2004 has been filed by the appellant Guddu Pandey against the judgment and order dated 28.8.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC No. 4, Deoria in S.T. 261 of 1999 whereby he was convicted for offence under Section 302 /149 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.15000/- and on failure to pay fine, to suffer further one year rigorous imprisonment, under Section 307 /149 I.P.C. for rigorous imprisonment of ten years and a fine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(All) 1806

B.AMIT STHALEKAR, ALI ZAMINGuddu Pandey – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (29)

B.AMIT STHALEKAR, ALI ZAMIN
Guddu Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent