SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1854

SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAJEEV MISRA
Gulabpati – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Rani Pandey – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ganesh Datt Mishra
For the Respondent: Manoj Kumar Singh

Table of Content
1. appeal initiated against family court judgment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. plaintiff claims to be the legally wedded wife. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court frame issues for adjudication. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's evaluation of evidence and issues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. emphasis on adherence to procedural rules for evidence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

Rajeev Misra, J.

1. Present First Appeal under Section 19 of Family Court Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1984') has been filed by plaintiff-appellant challenging Judgment dated 28.10.2015 and decree dated 30.10.2015 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Basti dismissing O.S. No. 15 of 2010 ( Gulabpati Vs. Smt. Pushpa Rani Pandey and others ).

2. We have heard Mr. Ganesh Datt Mishra, learned counsel for plaintiff-appellant and Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing defendant-respondents 2 and 3. In spite of revision of cause list, no one has appeared on behalf of defendant-respondent 1, Smt. Pushpa Pandey.

3. Plaintiff-appellant Gulabpati (hereinafter referred to as 'appellant') filed O.S. No. 15 of 2010 ( Gulabpati Vs. Smt. Pushpa Rani Pandey and others ) for a decree of declarati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top