SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 374

S.K.DUBEY
SITARAM – Appellant
Versus
RAM CHARAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.LAHRI, S.P.P.SHRIVASTAVA

S. K. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant's second appeal who has lost in both the Courts below. The suit instituted by the plaintiff/ respondent No. 1, is for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his possesion of the agricultural suit land consisted in Survey Nos. 46/2 and 47/ 1, admeasuring 2 Bighas and 4 Biswas and 1 Bigha and 18 Biswas respectively, situated at village Mahiba, Tahsil Ater, District Bhind. The defendant also claimed mesne profits for the damage caused to his crops. It is not in dispute that the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 5 were co-owners (Bhumiswamis) of the land situated in Survey Nos. 46 and 47 along with other land. The Tahsildar, under Section 178 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959, for short, the 'code', in Case No. 17/ 71-72-27, vide order dated 3-9-1973 (Ex. P/ 1), ordered partition of the land between the co-owners. Suit land comprised in Survey Nos. 46/ 2 and 47/ 1, fell in the share of the plaintiff, while the land comprised in Survey No. 46/ 2 with other land fell in the share of defendant No. 1, Buddhe, father of appellant/ defendant No. 6. The Patwari gave a report of partition on 24-4-1978 (Ex. P/2) which was p















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top