GOVIND MATHUR, VIVEK VARMA
Pramod Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
District Inspector of Schools – Respondent
ORDER :
CIVIL MISC DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2019
This appeal is barred by limitation from 103 days.
Having considered the facts stated in the application seeking condonation of delay, we are satisfied that the appellant had justifiable reason to state that for a bonafide reason, he was prevented from filing the appeal in time, accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
ON APPEAL
1. This Special Appeal arises against the judgment and order dated 15.3.2019 passed by learned Single Bench in Writ-A. No. 16669 of 2001 (Pramod Kumar Pandey and others Vs. The DIOS and others) whereby the learned Single Bench arrived at conclusion that ad-hoc appointments of appellant-petitioners in short term vacancies were not made in accordance with procedure prescribed in the U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission (Removal of Difficulties) (Second) Order 1981 under para 2(3) (ii) and (iii).
2. In brief, Shakeldeha Inter College, Post Shakeldeha, District Chandauli, (in short referred as the 'Institution') is an aided and recognized Institution under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and the regulations framed thereunder are fully applicable. The U.P. High Schools and
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Escorts Ltd. and Others
Director of Education and others Vs. Gajadhar Prasad Verma
Shiv Gorakh Nath Charitable Society, Kanpur and Others Vs. Cantonment Board, Kanpur and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.