SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sita Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
"Waiver of notice to quit under Section 113, determination of tenancy under Section 106 and deposition by power of attorney holder on behalf of landlord are the main questions involved in this petition."
1. Heard Shri Manu Khare, learned counsel for the defendants-tenants/petitioners and Shri Chetan Prakash, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent.
Facts:
2. A shop in house No. D-58/12A-82, Gandhi Nagar, Sigra, Varanasi, was let out by its owner and landlady Smt. Sita Devi Agarwal (the plaintiff-respondent) to the defendants- tenants/petitioners No. 1 and 2 under a rent agreement dated 6.1.2009 at the monthly rent of Rs. 2,005. The tenancy commenced from 1.1.2009. Thereafter mutually the rent was enhanced with effect from 11.2.2011, from Rs. 2,005 to Rs. 3,000 per month. On 9.9.2013, the plaintiff-landlady/respondent issued a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act 1882") to the defendants-tenants/ petitioners determining the tenancy. Since the notice was not complied with by the defendants-tenants/petitioners, therefore, the plaintiff-landlady filed S.C.C. Suit No. 49 of 2014, Smt. S
Ganga Dutt Murarka vs. Kartik Chandra Das and Others
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and Another vs. Indusind Bank Ltd. and Others
Jeevan Dass vs. L.I.C. 1994 Supp3 SCC 694
Majati Subbarao vs. P.K.K. Krishna Rao
Man Kaur (dead) by LRs. vs. Hartar Singh Sangha
Sri Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. vs. High Court of Bombay
Sarup Singh Gupta vs. S. Jagdish Singh and Others
Union of India and Another vs. Sudarshan Lal Talwar
Vasantkumar Radhakisan Vora vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.