SUNEET KUMAR
Shakuntala Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suneet Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Samir Sharma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Satyendra Singh, learned counsels for the petitioner, Shri Sri Prakash Singh, learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent and Shri Abhinav Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the Allahabad Development Authority and the learned Senior Counsel for the state respondents.
2. The petitioner, primarily seeks a direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to compute her pension/family pension admissible her as per the Government Orders applicable to the Government Servants, issued from time to time.
3. The facts that emerge from the pleadings and averments of the learned counsel for the parties, briefly stated, is that the husband of the petitioner, Shri Surendra Singh, a member of the Development Authorities Centralized Services (Centralized Services) of the Development Authority, retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30 September 2001, from the post of Chief Engineer at Allahabad Development Authority (Development Authority) (presently Prayagraj Developmen
Deoki Nandan Prasad vs. State of Bihar
D.S. Nakara and Others vs. Union of India
FCI vs. Ashis Kumar Ganguly and Others
Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal vs. JCS Bora
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Patiala v. Mongol Singh and Other
State of Punjab vs. Iqbal Singh
Union of India vs. Charanjeet S. Gill
Western Coalfields Ltd. vs. Special Area Development Authority, Korba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.