SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
1. Heard Sri Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to extend the benefit of 05 additional quality points to the female teachers."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned policy decision of the State-Government for the transfer of Assistant Teachers in Basic Schools run by the U.P. Basic Education Board, is discriminatory inasmuch as a discrimination has been made between male assistant teachers and female assistant teachers in matters of transfer since five marks under Clause 8(4) of the Transfer Policy has been allotted to female teachers and they have been permitted to opt for transfer after one year of service while the same facility has not been extende
Balco Employees Union (registered) vs. Union of India
Bhavesh D. Parish vs. Union of India
Ehsan Khalid vs. Union of India and others
M.P. Oil Extraction vs. State of M.P. (1997) 7 SCC 592
Netai Bag vs. Stae of West Bengal
Narmada Bachao Andolan and others vs. Union of India
Pearless General and Investment and others vs. Reserve Bank of India
Ram Singh Vijay Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.