SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Hari Om Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Jyoti Bhatia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Kiran Kumar Arora, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The revision-applicant nos.1 & 2 have assailed the judgment and decree dated 06.02.2014 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.1, Bareilly in SCC Suit No.7 of 2011 whereby the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent.
3. The brief facts of the case are that respondent (plaintiff) instituted SCC Suit No.7 of 2011 contending inter alia that she is the owner of a shop and godown constructed over an area of 72.5 square meters situated in Shyamganj, Rile Godown, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as 'suit property') described at the foot of the plaint. She has let out the suit property to revision-applicant nos.1 & 2 (hereinafter referred to as 'applicants') on a monthly rent of Rs.25,000/- per month including taxes. The applicants have been carrying on business on the suit property in the name and style of M/s Saraswati Sales. The suit property was let out to applicants on 25.11.2008 for two years on the condition that entire rent of the suit property would be paid in advance by the applicants. The period of tenancy expired on 24.
Ashok Dulichand v. Madahavlal Dube and Another
Benga Behera and Another Vs. Braja Kishore Nanda and Others
Bobba Suramma Vs. Peddireddi Chandramma
K.B. Saha and Sons Private Limited Vs. Development Consultant Limited
Saudul Azeez Vs. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others
Shrimant Shamrao Suryavanshi and another vs. Pralhad Bhairoba Suryavanshi by Lrs. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.