RAJAN ROY, SAROJ YADAV
Kareem – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Anurag Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri S.P. Singh, learned A.G.A.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing a notice dated 18.03.2020 issued by the District Magistrate, Sitapur under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He has also sought a writ of mandamus directing the opposite party no. 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner in pursuance to the aforesaid notice, which is impugned herein.
3. The contention of learned counsel for petitioner Sri Anurag Singh is that the notice has been issued on the basis of a single criminal case, whereas, Section 2(b)(i) defines 'Goonda' to mean a person who either by himself or as member or leader of a gang, habitually commits or attempts to commit, or abates the commission of an offence punishable under Section 153 or 153-B or Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code or Chapter XV, or Chapter XVI, or Chapter XXII of the said code. The lodging of a single criminal case against the petitioner does not make him, a person, who habitually commits any aforesaid offence. In this regard he relies upon a judgment
Bhagubhaj v. District Magistrate
Gurucharan Singh v. State of Bombay
Hari Khemu Gawli v. Dy. Commissioner of Police
Krishna Kumar v. Union of India
M/s. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. v. State of Orissa
State of Gujarat v. Mehboob Khan
Subhash Mujimal Gandhi v. L. Miningliana
Vijay Narain Singh Vs. State of Bihar and Ors. reported in (1984) 3 SCC 14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.