SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Asha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) Award cost of the petition to the petitioners.
Submissions:
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are living as husband and wife and both are major and therefore protection may be granted to them so that the respondent no. 4, the father of the petitioner no. 1, may not harass the petitioners. He submits that a representation dated 17.09.2020 was submitted by the petitioner no. 1 before the respondent no. 2 but no action has been taken so far.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner no. 2 has taken away the petitioner no. 1 who appears to be duly married wife of one Sri. Mahesh Chandra and thus the petitioner no. 2 is an offender and therefore no protection can be granted to the petitioner.
4. We have carefully considered the submissions of learned c
A. Subhash Babu vs. State of A.P. (2011) 7 SCC 616
D. Velusamy vs. D. Patchaiammal
Jawala Ram and Others vs. State of Pepsu (Now Punjab) and Others
Kalyan Singh vs. State of U.P. AIR 1962 SC 1183
Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475
Proprietary Articles Trade Association vs. Attorney General for Canada
Standard Chartered Bank and Others vs. Directorate of Enforcement and Others AIR 2006 SC 1301
Shayara Bano vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.