SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 132

K. J. THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Sanjay Maurya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri S.D. Singh Jadaun for the sole appellant and learned A.G.A. for the respondent.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment dated 3.8.2013 passed by Shri Krishan Pratap Singh, Additional Session Judge, Court No.1, Varanasi, in Sessions Trial No.717 of 2010, under Sections 498A/302/304B of IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station – Shivpur, District – Varanasi, convicting and sentencing the appellant under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs.25,000/- failing in payment of fine two years additional rigorous imprisonment.

3. Before we begin to pen down the reasons, we are shocked that the charge was framed on 12.1.2011 which was for commission of offence under Section 304B/498A and also under Section 3/4 of D.P. Act. This charge came to be framed against the accused on 12.1.2011. The charge was framed by one Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Varanasi.

4. After his transfer, very strangely the new incumbent Sri Krishna Pratap Singh altered the charge and charged the accused for commission of offence under Section 302 I.P.C. Un

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top