SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1086

KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, AJAI TYAGI
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Upendra Kumar Pushkar.
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Abhishek Mayank, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. Though the matter is listed for hearing application for enlargement on bail we with consent of counsels heard the matter as record is before this Court. It is not disputed that the accused is in jail since 5.12.2009, so heard finally.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 27.10.2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No.459 of 2010 convicting accused-appellant for commission of offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo imprisonment for one year.

3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that on 01.06.2009 sister of complainant Tejpal Singh got married with accused Dharam Singh. He gave sufficient dowry in the marriage. However, Dharam Singh (husband of the deceased) and her in-laws were not satisfied with the dowry given

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top