Back
MANOJ MISRA, RAVI NATH TILHARI
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U P – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. We have heard Sri Sandeep Kumar for the petitioners; the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1, 2 and 3; and have perused the record.
2. At the outset, Sri Sandeep Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the cause of action to file the present petition is with the second petitioner and, therefore, he prays to withdraw this petition in so far as the petitioner no.1 (Ravi Kumar) is concerned.
3. In view of the above, the petition of petitioner no.1 (Ravi Kumar) is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner no.2 (Thagai), for the sake of convenience, would hereinafter be referred to as the petitioner.
4. In brief the facts giving rise to this petition, as could be elicited from the petition, are as follows: The petitioner being member of fishermen community, pursuant to an advertisement inviting bids for settlement of fishery lease of Gaon Sabha ponds for a period of ten years, after depositing security amount of Rs.1.47 lacs, participated in an auction held on 30.09.2020. His bid, amongst four bidders, at Rs.13.40 lacs, was highest for the pond i.e. plot no.421 @ 1.137 hectare. Vide condition no.2 of the advertisement, provisions of sections 189 an
Point of law: provisions of Rule 57(8) of the Rules, 2016 are ultra vires Article 21 of the Constitution is concerned, that is completely misconceived because fishery lease is obtained not merely to ....
The eligibility criteria for fishery lease allotment as per Rule 57 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 must be met for a valid allotment.
Point of law: The expression "mutatis mutandis" itself implies applicability of any provision with necessary changes in points of detail. The rules which are adopted, make the principles embodied in ....
The judgment established that alleged customs or usages from the erstwhile state of Travancore-Cochin are not protected by the laws prevailing in the transferred territory, as per the Tamil Nadu (Tra....
When as per auction, highest bidder could not deposit the 25 per cent of bid amount which was required to be deposited by him then there was no other option left with authorities but to re-auction po....
Existing rights of landless poor persons cannot be revoked without clear legislative intent for retrospective application, and principles of natural justice must be adhered to in administrative actio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
