Munshi Singh vs State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 214

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 214

J. J. MUNIR
Munshi Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Anil Kumar Srivastava
For The Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

1. This revision is directed against a judgment and order of Mr. Vivek, the then Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 6, Agra dated 07.06.2016, partly allowing Criminal Appeal No. 233 of 2013, and modifying the revisionist's conviction and sentences awarded by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Agra, vide judgment and order dated 02.07.2013 in Criminal Case No. 572 of 2010, State v. Munshi Singh, acquitting him of the charge under Section 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (for short “IPC”) but upholding his conviction for offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

2. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. P.N. Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Nitin Kesarwani, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State.

3. The prosecution case, set out in the First Information Report, (for short “FIR”) is that on 08.06.2001, the informant, Tunda Ram, along with his son Mukesh, besides Pratap Singh, son of Sohran Singh, a native of Village -Nagla Veer Bhan, Police Station -Jagner, and another Gopi Chand, son of Bhanwar Singh, a resident of Singaich, Police Station -Jagn