Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Narender – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition filed against conviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the accident and evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense argues false implication. (Para 7) |
| 4. state supports trial court's judgment. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's review obligations in a revision. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. elements of offences under ipc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. burden of proof in rash/negligent driving cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. assessment of witness credibility and prosecution's burden. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. court finds no grounds for conviction. (Para 23) |
| 10. petition allowed and previous judgments set aside. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj kumar Ohri, J. The present revision petition has been filed under Sections 397 /401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner assailing the judgment dated 18.12.2019 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-02 (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Crl. Appeal No. 30/2019, whereby the judgment on conviction dated 09.05.2019 and the order on sentence dated 28.05.2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in FIR No. 51/2006 registered under Sections 279 /304A I
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
