Back
SALIL KUMAR RAI
Suman Lata – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Salil Kumar Rai, J.
1. Heard Shri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Prashant Mathur, Advocate and Shri Bharat K. Srivastava, Advocate, representing the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 30.7.2020 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Bareilly Cantt, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as, 'C.E.O.') retiring the petitioner w.e.f. 31.7.2020 and for a consequential mandamus not to disturb her peaceful functioning as Headmistress till 31.3.2021, i.e., till the end of the present academic session.
3. The facts of the case are that R.A. Bazar, Primary School, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as, 'Institution') is managed by the Cantonment Board, Bareilly. It has been stated in the writ petition that the Institution was recognized w.e.f. July 1959 by order dated 24.8.1959 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as, 'D.I.O.S.'), i.e., before the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as, 'Act, 1972') was enacted and continues to be recognized by the Basic Shiksha Parishad, i.e., the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Boa
Point of law: State Government is empowered to make Rules prescribing the conditions of service of officers, teachers and its employees appointed under Section 6 of the Act, 1972, the conditions of s....
The court established that once a teacher has reached the age of superannuation, any extension of service must be explicitly provided by law, and the provisions of the UP Intermediate Education Act, ....
Employment and Service matter - Payment of provident fund - New Pension Scheme - Enforcement of - Under impugned order making applicable NPS being institutions brought within the purview of Payment o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the AICTE Regulations, UGC Regulations, and Council of Architecture Regulations are applicable to the age of superannuation of faculty members....
Point of law: Service Law - Teaching and non teaching staff - Grant old pension Scheme - Rule 19 of Rules of 1978 is applicable for the payment of provident fund to teachers and head masters employed....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that teachers at State-aided educational institutions in Uttar Pradesh are governed by the Applicable Rules and not the Government Employees Rules.....
Point of Law : A Government servant has no right to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation and if he is retained beyond that age it is only in the exercise of the discretion of the Gove....
The distinction between Government and privately managed schools is a reasonable and valid classification, and the Punjab Act and Central Service Rules govern the service conditions of teaching facul....
The authority of the Municipal Council to impose retirement at 58 years prevails over external regulations; orders violating principles of natural justice must be quashed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
