IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, RAVI NATH TILHARI, JJ.
Mukesh Tandon - Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ - C No. - 1037 of 2021
Decided on : 15-03-2021
Writ Petition - Order on Impleadment. Application - Disciplinary proceeding - Scheme of Central Government called as “Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana - Nature of certiorari - Empanelment as well as action for de-empanelment is governed by guidelines issued by the Central Government - Suspended - Sought for quashing the impugned order passed by the respondent no.3 - According to petitioner, he owns and runs a Hospital under name and style of “Dayal Nursing Home, having its registered office A-1 H.I.G., Mundera, Prayagraj” - Aforesaid hospital is empanelled under scheme of Central Government called as “Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY)” - Earlier aforesaid scheme was known as Ayushman Bharat Jan Arogya Yojana - According to respondents, on receipt of certain information from National Anti Fraud Unit (NAFU) with respect to working of the petitioner’s hospital, petitioner’s hospital was put on “Watch-List” of State Anti Fraud Unit (SAFU).
Finding of the court: principles of natural justice are those rules which have been laid down by the Courts as being the minimum protection of the rights of the individual against the arbitrary procedure that may be adopted by a judicial, quasi-judicial and administrative authority while making an order affecting those rights. These rules are intended to prevent such authority from doing injustice. Even an administrative order which involves civil consequences must be consistent with the rules of natural justice - Court find that non issuance of show cause notice to petitioner’s hospital before passing final order , has resulted in breach of principle of natural justice - Since it is admitted case of respondents that neither any show cause notice was issued nor any opportunity of hearing was afforded to petitioner confronting with the material available in hands of respondents, therefore, the impugned order passed by Chief Executive Officer of State Health Agency (SHA), U.P. Lucknow cannot be sustained and is hereby quashed.
Result: Writ petition is disposed of
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Suryabhan Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 5, Sri Arvind Kumar Goswami, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 4 and Sri Madhukar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3, 6, and 7.
Order on Impleadment Application
2. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the Impleadment Application No.2 of 2021 is partly allowed and the proposed respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are allowed to be impleaded.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:-
3. (I) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 24.12.2020 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition)passed by the respondent no.3.
4. Order on writ petition
With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is being finally heard without calling for a counter affidavit.
5. Facts
Briefly stated facts of the present case are that according to the petitioner, he owns and runs a Hospital under the name and style of “Dayal Nursing Home, having its registered office A-1 H.I.G., Mundera, Prayagraj”. The aforesaid hospital is empanelled under the scheme of Central Government called as “Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY)”.
Earlier the aforesaid scheme was known as Ayushman Bharat Jan Arogya Yojana. According to the respondents, on receipt of certain information from National Anti Fraud Unit (NAFU) with respect to the working of the petitioner’s hospital, the petitioner’s hospital was put on “Watch-List” of the State Anti Fraud Unit (SAFU). Super specialist was hired by the State Health Agency (SHA) i.e. Avighna Mednet (OPC) Pvt. Ltd, which submitted its analysis report. On the basis of alleged prima facie fraudulent activity, the empanelment of the petitioner’s hospital was suspended by order dated 04.12.2020 with immediate effect, by the State Health Agency.
6. According to the respondents, after the hospital was suspended from the empanelment, certain investigations were made, the statement of the petitioner was recorded on 09.12.2020 and certain evidences were collected. The field investigation was allegedly conducted on 09.12.2020. The field investigation report and comparative analysis (Desk Audit vs Case Sheets allegedly found in the hospital at the time of Hospital Audit) was submitted on 15.12.20202. Based on the aforesaid material, the empanelment of the petitioner’s hospital was cancelled, three times of the disputed amount was imposed as penalty and the entire amount was directed to be recovered by the impugned order dated 24.12.2020 passed by the Chief Executive Officer-SHA (Uttar Pradesh), Lucknow. Aggrieved with this aforesaid order, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
7. Discussion and Findings
It is admitted by the learned counsels for the parties that empanelment as well as action for de-empanelment is governed by the guidelines issued by the Central Government with respect to Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (ABPMJAY). Copy of the aforesaid guidelines has been produced before us by both the learned counsels for the parties, which is kept on record. The copy of instructions as produced by learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3, 6 and 7 is also kept on record.
8. The process for disciplinary proceeding of the de-empanelment is provided in Para 1.10 of the aforesaid guidelines. Part-A of para 1.10 of the aforesaid guidelines provides for institutional mechanism. Part-B provides for steps for disciplinary proceedings, which is relevant for the purposes of the present case and is reproduced below:-
Pradhan Mantri Rashtriya Swasthya Suraksha Mission (PMRSSM)-Guideline
Step 1 - Putting the provider on “Watch-list”
Based on the claims, data analysis and/or the provider visits, if there is any doubt on the performance of a Provider, the SE
Concept of natural justice and observed that it is another name of common sense justice. The adherence to principles of natural justice as recognized by all civilized States is of supreme importance ....
Disciplinary action necessitates adherence to statutory rules, including providing a disagreement note when diverging from inquiry findings, as failure to do so violates principles of natural justice....
The court emphasized the necessity of a specific show cause notice before blacklisting, ensuring compliance with natural justice principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.