SIDDHARTH
Shivam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. in the Court today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application This exemption application is allowed.
4. Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, Shivam, in Case Crime No. 16 of 2020, under Sections-323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station-Churkhi, District-Jalaun at post-cognizance stage.
5. Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
6. The allegation in
Azija Begum v. State of Maharashtra
Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. CBI
Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat
Jamuna Chaudhary & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1974 SC 1822
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secy.
Mahmood Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1976 SC 69
Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866
Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.