RAMESH SINHA, VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Heera Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAMESH SINHA, J.
1. The Court has convened through Video Conferencing.
2. Heard Sri. H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mrs. Meenakshi Singh Parihar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/respondents no. 1 and 2.
3. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, Heera Lal Yadav, challenging the First Information Report dated 27.10.2020 to the extent of petitioner registered as Case Crime No. 0013 of 2020, under Sections 120-B, 471, 468, 467 and 420 I.P.C. Police Station S.I.T. Lucknow.
4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that earlier the petitioner has challenged the impugned F.I.R. before this Court at Allahabad by filing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12605 of 2020, Heera Lal Yadav vs. State of U.P. and Others, wherein, initially, a Coordinate Bench of this Court at Allahabad, vide order dated 14.12.2020, restrained the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner in connection with the impugned F.I.R. and the same was continued from time to time, however, whe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.