SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Ramesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Gool Poput – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Order on Civil Misc. Review Petition No.178479 of 2011.
1. Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate on behalf of review-applicant, Sri Satish Chandra Mishra, Sri Navin Sinha, and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Kapil Misra, Sri Ramanand Gupta, and Sri Vineet Sankalp learned counsel for the defendant-appellant.
2. The present review petition has been filed by the plaintiffs-respondents (hereinafter referred to as 'applicants') praying for the review of the judgment of this Court dated 25.05.2011 whereby this Court has allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to decide the same after giving the full opportunity of hearing to the parties and after getting the property in dispute identified.
3. The necessary facts for the present case detailed in the judgment dated 25.05.2011 are as under :-
4. The applicants instituted a suit praying that defendants-appellants (hereinafter referred to as appellants) may be restrained from interfering with the possession over the plot shown by letters 'A, B, C & D' in the map attached with the plaint and boundaries given at the foot of the plaint.
5. The plaint case
Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Lily Thomas etc. Vs. Union of India and Others
Municipal Corporation Vs. Surendra Singh
Naba Kishore Mohanta Vs. Janardan
P.Purushottam Vs. Pratap Steel
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Another Vs. N. Raju Reddiear and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.